First portGlobal rank #66
Chattogram
Bangladesh · BDCGP · Asia
Moderate activity59.5/ 100
−12.11% 24H movementMODELED · 33m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #30
Haiphong
Vietnam · VNHPH · Asia
Strong activity75.4/ 100
+12.54% 24H movementMODELED · 26m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Chattogram leads in 3 of 6 tracked indicators.
Haiphong currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Haiphong
Efficiency
Chattogram
Growth
Haiphong
Reliability
Chattogram
Capacity
Haiphong
Risk
Chattogram
Activity score · modeled
59.5
Chattogram
MODERATE
Difference
+15.9
75.4
Haiphong
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
ChattogramHaiphong
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
ChattogramHaiphong
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Chattogram | Haiphong | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #66 | #30 | 36 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 240K | 558K | Haiphong +318K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Moderate | Strong | Haiphong +15.9 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −12.11% | +12.54% | Haiphong +24.65 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 2 | 8 | Haiphong 6 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 5 | 21 | Haiphong 16 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 1 | 2 | Chattogram 1 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 3.8h | 5.5h | Chattogram 1.7h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 20h | 13.9h | Haiphong 6.1h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 50% | 80% | Haiphong 30.0 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Clear | Clear | Same status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
2
8
Inbound
5
21
Waiting
1
2
Berth wait
3.8h
5.5h
Time at berth
20h
13.9h
Utilization
50%
80%
ChattogramHaiphong
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Haiphong is handling approximately 318K more monthly TEUs than Chattogram.
- Chattogram currently shows a 1.7 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Chattogram has 1 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Haiphong has 30.0 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 36 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Chattogram vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Haiphong vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology