Portflow / Intelligence

Port VS

Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.

First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.

Portflow research view · modeled scenario

First portGlobal rank #56
UK

Felixstowe

UK · GBFXT · Europe

Strong activity72.8/ 100
+12.00% 24H movementMODELED · 39m ago
Second portGlobal rank #82
UK

London Gateway

UK · GBLGP · Europe

Strong activity74.1/ 100
+39.29% 24H movementMODELED · 25m ago

Comparison overview · modeled scenario

Felixstowe leads in 3 of 6 tracked indicators.

London Gateway currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.

Momentum
London Gateway
Efficiency
Felixstowe
Growth
London Gateway
Reliability
Felixstowe
Capacity
London Gateway
Risk
Felixstowe

Activity score · modeled

72.8
Felixstowe
POSITIVE
Difference
+1.3
74.1
London Gateway
POSITIVE

Port Activity (TEU)

Modeled activity series

01
Time range
FelixstoweLondon Gateway

Performance Shape

Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled

FelixstoweLondon Gateway

Comparison Scoreboard

Reported throughput · modeled operations

02
MetricFelixstoweLondon GatewayDifference
Global rank#56#8226 places apart
Monthly TEU · REPORTED291K178KFelixstowe +113K TEU
Current activity · MODELEDStrongStrongLondon Gateway +1.3 pts
Activity movement · 24H+12.00%+39.29%London Gateway +27.29 pts
Vessels alongside · MODELED32Felixstowe 1 vessels more
Vessels inbound · MODELED106Felixstowe 4 vessels more
Vessels waiting · MODELED11Even
Average berth wait · MODELED4.2h4.2hEven
Average time at berth · MODELED14.7h20.8hFelixstowe 6.1h less
Berth utilization · MODELED60%66.7%London Gateway 6.7 pts more
Congestion / statusClearClearSame status

Operations Comparison

MODELED operational sequence

04
Alongside
3
2
Inbound
10
6
Waiting
1
1
Berth wait
4.2h
4.2h
Time at berth
14.7h
20.8h
Utilization
60%
66.7%
FelixstoweLondon Gateway

Key Differences

Directly derived from current values

03
  • Felixstowe is handling approximately 113K more monthly TEUs than London Gateway.
  • Felixstowe currently shows a 0.0 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
  • Felixstowe has 0 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
  • London Gateway has 6.7 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
  • The ports are 26 places apart in the global throughput ranking.

Regional Context

Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers

05
Felixstowe vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
London Gateway vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K

Continue exploring

Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology