First portGlobal rank #60
Fuzhou
China · CNFOC · Asia
Moderate activity64.1/ 100
−9.59% 24H movementMODELED · 38m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #14
Xiamen
China · CNXMN · Asia
Strong activity70.9/ 100
−6.83% 24H movementMODELED · 6m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Xiamen leads in 5 of 6 tracked indicators.
Fuzhou currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Xiamen
Efficiency
Xiamen
Growth
Xiamen
Reliability
Fuzhou
Capacity
Xiamen
Risk
Xiamen
Activity score · modeled
64.1
Fuzhou
MODERATE
Difference
+6.8
70.9
Xiamen
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
FuzhouXiamen
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
FuzhouXiamen
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Fuzhou | Xiamen | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #60 | #14 | 46 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 265K | 952K | Xiamen +686K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Moderate | Strong | Xiamen +6.8 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −9.59% | −6.83% | Xiamen +2.76 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 3 | 12 | Xiamen 9 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 6 | 26 | Xiamen 20 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 2 | 2 | Even |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 7.2h | 7.1h | Xiamen 0.1h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 14.9h | 14.4h | Xiamen 0.5h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 60% | 66.7% | Xiamen 6.7 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Building | Building | Same status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
3
12
Inbound
6
26
Waiting
2
2
Berth wait
7.2h
7.1h
Time at berth
14.9h
14.4h
Utilization
60%
66.7%
FuzhouXiamen
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Xiamen is handling approximately 686K more monthly TEUs than Fuzhou.
- Xiamen currently shows a 0.1 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Fuzhou has 0 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Xiamen has 6.7 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 46 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Fuzhou vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Xiamen vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology