Portflow / Intelligence

Port VS

Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.

First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.

Portflow research view · modeled scenario

First portGlobal rank #26
Germany

Hamburg

Germany · DEHAM · Europe

Moderate activity68.6/ 100
−13.27% 24H movementMODELED · 15m ago
Second portGlobal rank #47
Germany

Bremerhaven

Germany · DEBRV · Europe

Moderate activity66.3/ 100
−17.74% 24H movementMODELED · 17m ago

Comparison overview · modeled scenario

Bremerhaven leads in 4 of 6 tracked indicators.

Hamburg currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.

Momentum
Hamburg
Efficiency
Bremerhaven
Growth
Bremerhaven
Reliability
Bremerhaven
Capacity
Hamburg
Risk
Bremerhaven

Activity score · modeled

68.6
Hamburg
POSITIVE
Difference
+2.3
66.3
Bremerhaven
POSITIVE

Port Activity (TEU)

Modeled activity series

01
Time range
HamburgBremerhaven

Performance Shape

Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled

HamburgBremerhaven

Comparison Scoreboard

Reported throughput · modeled operations

02
MetricHamburgBremerhavenDifference
Global rank#26#4721 places apart
Monthly TEU · REPORTED631K348KHamburg +283K TEU
Current activity · MODELEDModerateModerateHamburg +2.3 pts
Activity movement · 24H−13.27%−17.74%Hamburg +4.47 pts
Vessels alongside · MODELED93Hamburg 6 vessels more
Vessels inbound · MODELED249Hamburg 15 vessels more
Vessels waiting · MODELED52Bremerhaven 3 vessels less
Average berth wait · MODELED12.7h5.1hBremerhaven 7.6h less
Average time at berth · MODELED24.7h19.6hBremerhaven 5.1h less
Berth utilization · MODELED64.3%50%Hamburg 14.3 pts more
Congestion / statusCongestedClearDifferent status

Operations Comparison

MODELED operational sequence

04
Alongside
9
3
Inbound
24
9
Waiting
5
2
Berth wait
12.7h
5.1h
Time at berth
24.7h
19.6h
Utilization
64.3%
50%
HamburgBremerhaven

Key Differences

Directly derived from current values

03
  • Hamburg is handling approximately 283K more monthly TEUs than Bremerhaven.
  • Bremerhaven currently shows a 7.6 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
  • Bremerhaven has 3 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
  • Hamburg has 14.3 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
  • The ports are 21 places apart in the global throughput ranking.

Regional Context

Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers

05
Hamburg vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
Bremerhaven vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K

Continue exploring

Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology