First portGlobal rank #85
Izmit Bay
Turkiye · TRIZM · Europe
Strong activity71.7/ 100
+1.27% 24H movementMODELED · 14m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #64
Ambarli
Turkiye · TRAMB · Europe
Moderate activity58.1/ 100
−13.67% 24H movementMODELED · 5m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Izmit Bay leads in 5 of 6 tracked indicators.
Ambarli currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Izmit Bay
Efficiency
Izmit Bay
Growth
Ambarli
Reliability
Izmit Bay
Capacity
Izmit Bay
Risk
Izmit Bay
Activity score · modeled
71.7
Izmit Bay
POSITIVE
Difference
+13.6
58.1
Ambarli
MODERATE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
Izmit BayAmbarli
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
Izmit BayAmbarli
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Izmit Bay | Ambarli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #85 | #64 | 21 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 162K | 259K | Ambarli +97K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Strong | Moderate | Izmit Bay +13.6 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | +1.27% | −13.67% | Izmit Bay +14.94 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 2 | 2 | Even |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 6 | 6 | Even |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 0 | 1 | Izmit Bay 1 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 3h | 4.9h | Izmit Bay 1.9h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 19.5h | 17.7h | Ambarli 1.8h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 66.7% | 40% | Izmit Bay 26.7 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Clear | Clear | Same status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
2
2
Inbound
6
6
Waiting
0
1
Berth wait
3h
4.9h
Time at berth
19.5h
17.7h
Utilization
66.7%
40%
Izmit BayAmbarli
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Ambarli is handling approximately 97K more monthly TEUs than Izmit Bay.
- Izmit Bay currently shows a 1.9 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Izmit Bay has 1 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Izmit Bay has 26.7 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 21 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Izmit Bay vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
Ambarli vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology