First portGlobal rank #68
Le Havre
France · FRLEH · Europe
Strong activity73.1/ 100
−7.70% 24H movementMODELED · 51m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #82
London Gateway
UK · GBLGP · Europe
Strong activity74.1/ 100
+39.29% 24H movementMODELED · 25m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
London Gateway leads in 5 of 6 tracked indicators.
Le Havre currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
London Gateway
Efficiency
London Gateway
Growth
London Gateway
Reliability
London Gateway
Capacity
Le Havre
Risk
London Gateway
Activity score · modeled
73.1
Le Havre
POSITIVE
Difference
+1.0
74.1
London Gateway
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
Le HavreLondon Gateway
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
Le HavreLondon Gateway
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Le Havre | London Gateway | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #68 | #82 | 14 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 243K | 178K | Le Havre +65K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Strong | Strong | London Gateway +1.0 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −7.70% | +39.29% | London Gateway +46.99 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 3 | 2 | Le Havre 1 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 8 | 6 | Le Havre 2 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 2 | 1 | London Gateway 1 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 7h | 4.2h | London Gateway 2.8h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 16.5h | 20.8h | Le Havre 4.3h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 75% | 66.7% | Le Havre 8.3 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Building | Clear | Different status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
3
2
Inbound
8
6
Waiting
2
1
Berth wait
7h
4.2h
Time at berth
16.5h
20.8h
Utilization
75%
66.7%
Le HavreLondon Gateway
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Le Havre is handling approximately 65K more monthly TEUs than London Gateway.
- London Gateway currently shows a 2.8 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- London Gateway has 1 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Le Havre has 8.3 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 14 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Le Havre vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
London Gateway vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology