First portGlobal rank #39
Manila
Philippines · PHMNL · Asia
Moderate activity64.6/ 100
−13.06% 24H movementMODELED · 2m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #20
Kaohsiung
Taiwan · TWKHH · Asia
Strong activity76.7/ 100
+5.36% 24H movementMODELED · 42m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Manila leads in 3 of 6 tracked indicators.
Kaohsiung currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Kaohsiung
Efficiency
Manila
Growth
Kaohsiung
Reliability
Manila
Capacity
Kaohsiung
Risk
Manila
Activity score · modeled
64.6
Manila
MODERATE
Difference
+12.1
76.7
Kaohsiung
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
ManilaKaohsiung
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
ManilaKaohsiung
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Manila | Kaohsiung | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #39 | #20 | 19 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 419K | 720K | Kaohsiung +302K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Moderate | Strong | Kaohsiung +12.1 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −13.06% | +5.36% | Kaohsiung +18.41 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 4 | 9 | Kaohsiung 5 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 10 | 28 | Kaohsiung 18 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 3 | 3 | Even |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 6.8h | 7.7h | Manila 0.9h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 11.4h | 12.8h | Manila 1.4h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 50% | 64.3% | Kaohsiung 14.3 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Clear | Building | Different status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
4
9
Inbound
10
28
Waiting
3
3
Berth wait
6.8h
7.7h
Time at berth
11.4h
12.8h
Utilization
50%
64.3%
ManilaKaohsiung
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Kaohsiung is handling approximately 302K more monthly TEUs than Manila.
- Manila currently shows a 0.9 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Manila has 0 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Kaohsiung has 14.3 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 19 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Manila vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Kaohsiung vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology