Portflow / Intelligence

Port VS

Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.

First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.

Portflow research view · modeled scenario

First portGlobal rank #65
Malta

Marsaxlokk

Malta · MTMAR · Europe

Moderate activity68.0/ 100
−13.38% 24H movementMODELED · 12m ago
Second portGlobal rank #51
Italy

Gioia Tauro

Italy · ITGIT · Europe

Moderate activity69.1/ 100
+1.32% 24H movementMODELED · 13m ago

Comparison overview · modeled scenario

Marsaxlokk leads in 4 of 6 tracked indicators.

Gioia Tauro currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.

Momentum
Gioia Tauro
Efficiency
Marsaxlokk
Growth
Marsaxlokk
Reliability
Marsaxlokk
Capacity
Gioia Tauro
Risk
Marsaxlokk

Activity score · modeled

68.0
Marsaxlokk
POSITIVE
Difference
+1.1
69.1
Gioia Tauro
POSITIVE

Port Activity (TEU)

Modeled activity series

01
Time range
MarsaxlokkGioia Tauro

Performance Shape

Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled

MarsaxlokkGioia Tauro

Comparison Scoreboard

Reported throughput · modeled operations

02
MetricMarsaxlokkGioia TauroDifference
Global rank#65#5114 places apart
Monthly TEU · REPORTED259K315KGioia Tauro +57K TEU
Current activity · MODELEDModerateModerateGioia Tauro +1.1 pts
Activity movement · 24H−13.38%+1.32%Gioia Tauro +14.70 pts
Vessels alongside · MODELED35Gioia Tauro 2 vessels more
Vessels inbound · MODELED813Gioia Tauro 5 vessels more
Vessels waiting · MODELED13Marsaxlokk 2 vessels less
Average berth wait · MODELED4.7h9.4hMarsaxlokk 4.7h less
Average time at berth · MODELED22.7h20.9hGioia Tauro 1.8h less
Berth utilization · MODELED60%83.3%Gioia Tauro 23.3 pts more
Congestion / statusClearBuildingDifferent status

Operations Comparison

MODELED operational sequence

04
Alongside
3
5
Inbound
8
13
Waiting
1
3
Berth wait
4.7h
9.4h
Time at berth
22.7h
20.9h
Utilization
60%
83.3%
MarsaxlokkGioia Tauro

Key Differences

Directly derived from current values

03
  • Gioia Tauro is handling approximately 57K more monthly TEUs than Marsaxlokk.
  • Marsaxlokk currently shows a 4.7 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
  • Marsaxlokk has 2 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
  • Gioia Tauro has 23.3 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
  • The ports are 14 places apart in the global throughput ranking.

Regional Context

Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers

05
Marsaxlokk vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K
Gioia Tauro vs. EuropeAvg 364K
Rotterdam1.12M
Antwerp-Bruges1.09M
Hamburg631K
Valencia445K
Piraeus404K

Continue exploring

Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology