First portGlobal rank #29
Mundra
India · INMUN · Asia
Moderate activity67.3/ 100
−14.16% 24H movementMODELED · 11m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #99
Port Qasim
Pakistan · PKBQM · Asia
Moderate activity59.5/ 100
−10.93% 24H movementMODELED · 50m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Port Qasim leads in 4 of 6 tracked indicators.
Mundra currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Port Qasim
Efficiency
Port Qasim
Growth
Mundra
Reliability
Port Qasim
Capacity
Mundra
Risk
Port Qasim
Activity score · modeled
67.3
Mundra
POSITIVE
Difference
+7.8
59.5
Port Qasim
MODERATE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
MundraPort Qasim
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
MundraPort Qasim
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Mundra | Port Qasim | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #29 | #99 | 70 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 574K | 124K | Mundra +450K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Moderate | Moderate | Mundra +7.8 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −14.16% | −10.93% | Port Qasim +3.23 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 7 | 1 | Mundra 6 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 15 | 2 | Mundra 13 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 3 | 0 | Port Qasim 3 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 5.4h | 3h | Port Qasim 2.4h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 21.4h | 14.7h | Port Qasim 6.7h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 63.6% | 50% | Mundra 13.6 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Clear | Clear | Same status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
7
1
Inbound
15
2
Waiting
3
0
Berth wait
5.4h
3h
Time at berth
21.4h
14.7h
Utilization
63.6%
50%
MundraPort Qasim
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Mundra is handling approximately 450K more monthly TEUs than Port Qasim.
- Port Qasim currently shows a 2.4 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Port Qasim has 3 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Mundra has 13.6 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 70 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Mundra vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Port Qasim vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology