First portGlobal rank #3
Ningbo-Zhoushan
China · CNNGB · Asia
Strong activity79.3/ 100
+8.33% 24H movementMODELED · 30m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
China · CNNGB · Asia
China · CNSHA · Asia
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Shanghai currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Activity score · modeled
Modeled activity series
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Ningbo-Zhoushan | Shanghai | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #3 | #1 | 2 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 2.98M | 3.91M | Shanghai +926K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Strong | Moderate | Ningbo-Zhoushan +17.2 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | +8.33% | −15.74% | Ningbo-Zhoushan +24.07 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 27 | 19 | Ningbo-Zhoushan 8 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 84 | 50 | Ningbo-Zhoushan 34 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 12 | 5 | Shanghai 7 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 19.3h | 13.2h | Shanghai 6.1h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 13.3h | 17.6h | Ningbo-Zhoushan 4.3h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 75% | 44.2% | Ningbo-Zhoushan 30.8 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Congested | Congested | Same status |
MODELED operational sequence
Directly derived from current values
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology