Portflow / Intelligence

Port VS

Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.

First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.

Portflow research view · modeled scenario

First portGlobal rank #5
China

Qingdao

China · CNTAO · Asia

Strong activity73.1/ 100
+4.73% 24H movementMODELED · 14m ago
Second portGlobal rank #32
China

Rizhao

China · CNRZH · Asia

Moderate activity68.2/ 100
−2.29% 24H movementMODELED · 43m ago

Comparison overview · modeled scenario

Qingdao leads in 3 of 6 tracked indicators.

Rizhao currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.

Momentum
Qingdao
Efficiency
Rizhao
Growth
Qingdao
Reliability
Rizhao
Capacity
Qingdao
Risk
Rizhao

Activity score · modeled

73.1
Qingdao
POSITIVE
Difference
+4.9
68.2
Rizhao
POSITIVE

Port Activity (TEU)

Modeled activity series

01
Time range
QingdaoRizhao

Performance Shape

Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled

QingdaoRizhao

Comparison Scoreboard

Reported throughput · modeled operations

02
MetricQingdaoRizhaoDifference
Global rank#5#3227 places apart
Monthly TEU · REPORTED2.34M516KQingdao +1.83M TEU
Current activity · MODELEDStrongModerateQingdao +4.9 pts
Activity movement · 24H+4.73%−2.29%Qingdao +7.02 pts
Vessels alongside · MODELED326Qingdao 26 vessels more
Vessels inbound · MODELED5814Qingdao 44 vessels more
Vessels waiting · MODELED64Rizhao 2 vessels less
Average berth wait · MODELED11.6h9.7hRizhao 1.9h less
Average time at berth · MODELED16.7h11.4hRizhao 5.3h less
Berth utilization · MODELED80%60%Qingdao 20.0 pts more
Congestion / statusBuildingBuildingSame status

Operations Comparison

MODELED operational sequence

04
Alongside
32
6
Inbound
58
14
Waiting
6
4
Berth wait
11.6h
9.7h
Time at berth
16.7h
11.4h
Utilization
80%
60%
QingdaoRizhao

Key Differences

Directly derived from current values

03
  • Qingdao is handling approximately 1.83M more monthly TEUs than Rizhao.
  • Rizhao currently shows a 1.9 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
  • Rizhao has 2 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
  • Qingdao has 20.0 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
  • The ports are 27 places apart in the global throughput ranking.

Regional Context

Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers

05
Qingdao vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Rizhao vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M

Continue exploring

Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology