Portflow / Intelligence

Port VS

Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.

First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.

Portflow research view · modeled scenario

First portGlobal rank #32
China

Rizhao

China · CNRZH · Asia

Moderate activity68.2/ 100
−2.29% 24H movementMODELED · 43m ago
Second portGlobal rank #33
China

Lianyungang

China · CNLYG · Asia

Moderate activity67.5/ 100
−11.18% 24H movementMODELED · 40m ago

Comparison overview · modeled scenario

Rizhao leads in 4 of 6 tracked indicators.

Lianyungang currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.

Momentum
Rizhao
Efficiency
Rizhao
Growth
Lianyungang
Reliability
Rizhao
Capacity
Lianyungang
Risk
Rizhao

Activity score · modeled

68.2
Rizhao
POSITIVE
Difference
+0.7
67.5
Lianyungang
POSITIVE

Port Activity (TEU)

Modeled activity series

01
Time range
RizhaoLianyungang

Performance Shape

Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled

RizhaoLianyungang

Comparison Scoreboard

Reported throughput · modeled operations

02
MetricRizhaoLianyungangDifference
Global rank#32#331 places apart
Monthly TEU · REPORTED516K470KRizhao +46K TEU
Current activity · MODELEDModerateModerateRizhao +0.7 pts
Activity movement · 24H−2.29%−11.18%Rizhao +8.89 pts
Vessels alongside · MODELED66Even
Vessels inbound · MODELED1412Rizhao 2 vessels more
Vessels waiting · MODELED44Even
Average berth wait · MODELED9.7h11.3hRizhao 1.6h less
Average time at berth · MODELED11.4h16.4hRizhao 5.0h less
Berth utilization · MODELED60%66.7%Lianyungang 6.7 pts more
Congestion / statusBuildingBuildingSame status

Operations Comparison

MODELED operational sequence

04
Alongside
6
6
Inbound
14
12
Waiting
4
4
Berth wait
9.7h
11.3h
Time at berth
11.4h
16.4h
Utilization
60%
66.7%
RizhaoLianyungang

Key Differences

Directly derived from current values

03
  • Rizhao is handling approximately 46K more monthly TEUs than Lianyungang.
  • Rizhao currently shows a 1.6 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
  • Rizhao has 0 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
  • Lianyungang has 6.7 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
  • The ports are 1 places apart in the global throughput ranking.

Regional Context

Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers

05
Rizhao vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Lianyungang vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M

Continue exploring

Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology