First portGlobal rank #62
Seattle / Tacoma
USA · USSEA · North America
Strong activity70.6/ 100
+11.71% 24H movementMODELED · 7m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #59
Vancouver
Canada · CAVAN · North America
Moderate activity68.6/ 100
−12.61% 24H movementMODELED · 12m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Seattle / Tacoma leads in 6 of 6 tracked indicators.
Vancouver currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Seattle / Tacoma
Efficiency
Seattle / Tacoma
Growth
Seattle / Tacoma
Reliability
Seattle / Tacoma
Capacity
Seattle / Tacoma
Risk
Seattle / Tacoma
Activity score · modeled
70.6
Seattle / Tacoma
POSITIVE
Difference
+2.0
68.6
Vancouver
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
Seattle / TacomaVancouver
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
Seattle / TacomaVancouver
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Seattle / Tacoma | Vancouver | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #62 | #59 | 3 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 256K | 268K | Vancouver +12K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Strong | Moderate | Seattle / Tacoma +2.0 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | +11.71% | −12.61% | Seattle / Tacoma +24.32 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 8 | 7 | Seattle / Tacoma 1 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 17 | 14 | Seattle / Tacoma 3 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 5 | 5 | Even |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 9.7h | 12.4h | Seattle / Tacoma 2.7h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 18.6h | 18.7h | Seattle / Tacoma 0.1h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 80% | 77.8% | Seattle / Tacoma 2.2 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Building | Congested | Different status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
8
7
Inbound
17
14
Waiting
5
5
Berth wait
9.7h
12.4h
Time at berth
18.6h
18.7h
Utilization
80%
77.8%
Seattle / TacomaVancouver
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Vancouver is handling approximately 12K more monthly TEUs than Seattle / Tacoma.
- Seattle / Tacoma currently shows a 2.7 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Seattle / Tacoma has 0 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Seattle / Tacoma has 2.2 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 3 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Seattle / Tacoma vs. North AmericaAvg 358K
Los Angeles790K
Long Beach740K
New York / New Jersey636K
Savannah429K
Houston335K
Vancouver vs. North AmericaAvg 358K
Los Angeles790K
Long Beach740K
New York / New Jersey636K
Savannah429K
Houston335K
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology