Portflow / Intelligence

Port VS

Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.

First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.

Portflow research view · modeled scenario

First portGlobal rank #1
China

Shanghai

China · CNSHA · Asia

Moderate activity62.1/ 100
−15.74% 24H movementMODELED · 13m ago
Second portGlobal rank #25
China

Taicang

China · CNTAC · Asia

Strong activity73.2/ 100
−9.18% 24H movementMODELED · 44m ago

Comparison overview · modeled scenario

Taicang leads in 6 of 6 tracked indicators.

Shanghai currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.

Momentum
Taicang
Efficiency
Taicang
Growth
Taicang
Reliability
Taicang
Capacity
Taicang
Risk
Taicang

Activity score · modeled

62.1
Shanghai
MODERATE
Difference
+11.1
73.2
Taicang
POSITIVE

Port Activity (TEU)

Modeled activity series

01
Time range
ShanghaiTaicang

Performance Shape

Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled

ShanghaiTaicang

Comparison Scoreboard

Reported throughput · modeled operations

02
MetricShanghaiTaicangDifference
Global rank#1#2524 places apart
Monthly TEU · REPORTED3.91M607KShanghai +3.30M TEU
Current activity · MODELEDModerateStrongTaicang +11.1 pts
Activity movement · 24H−15.74%−9.18%Taicang +6.56 pts
Vessels alongside · MODELED198Shanghai 11 vessels more
Vessels inbound · MODELED5019Shanghai 31 vessels more
Vessels waiting · MODELED53Taicang 2 vessels less
Average berth wait · MODELED13.2h5.4hTaicang 7.8h less
Average time at berth · MODELED17.6h23.8hShanghai 6.2h less
Berth utilization · MODELED44.2%72.7%Taicang 28.5 pts more
Congestion / statusCongestedClearDifferent status

Operations Comparison

MODELED operational sequence

04
Alongside
19
8
Inbound
50
19
Waiting
5
3
Berth wait
13.2h
5.4h
Time at berth
17.6h
23.8h
Utilization
44.2%
72.7%
ShanghaiTaicang

Key Differences

Directly derived from current values

03
  • Shanghai is handling approximately 3.30M more monthly TEUs than Taicang.
  • Taicang currently shows a 7.8 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
  • Taicang has 2 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
  • Taicang has 28.5 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
  • The ports are 24 places apart in the global throughput ranking.

Regional Context

Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers

05
Shanghai vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Taicang vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M

Continue exploring

Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology