First portGlobal rank #46
Tokyo
Japan · JPTYO · Asia
Moderate activity60.6/ 100
−21.71% 24H movementMODELED · 54m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #67
Yokohama
Japan · JPYOK · Asia
Strong activity71.8/ 100
−11.14% 24H movementMODELED · 30m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Tokyo leads in 3 of 6 tracked indicators.
Yokohama currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Yokohama
Efficiency
Tokyo
Growth
Yokohama
Reliability
Tokyo
Capacity
Yokohama
Risk
Tokyo
Activity score · modeled
60.6
Tokyo
MODERATE
Difference
+11.2
71.8
Yokohama
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
TokyoYokohama
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
TokyoYokohama
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Tokyo | Yokohama | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #46 | #67 | 21 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 326K | 228K | Tokyo +99K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Moderate | Strong | Yokohama +11.2 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −21.71% | −11.14% | Yokohama +10.57 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 3 | 3 | Even |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 8 | 6 | Tokyo 2 vessels more |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 1 | 2 | Tokyo 1 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 4.8h | 6.3h | Tokyo 1.5h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 22h | 16.7h | Yokohama 5.3h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 50% | 75% | Yokohama 25.0 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Clear | Clear | Same status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
3
3
Inbound
8
6
Waiting
1
2
Berth wait
4.8h
6.3h
Time at berth
22h
16.7h
Utilization
50%
75%
TokyoYokohama
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Tokyo is handling approximately 99K more monthly TEUs than Yokohama.
- Tokyo currently shows a 1.5 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Tokyo has 1 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Yokohama has 25.0 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 21 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Tokyo vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Yokohama vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology