First portGlobal rank #57
Incheon
South Korea · KRINC · Asia
Moderate activity64.8/ 100
−13.48% 24H movementMODELED · 49m ago
Portflow / Intelligence
Port VS
Compare activity, momentum, efficiency, risk and long-term performance across the global port network.
First port
Second port
Saved pairs stay on this device.
Portflow research view · modeled scenario
Second portGlobal rank #86
Gwangyang
South Korea · KRKAN · Asia
Strong activity70.6/ 100
−2.62% 24H movementMODELED · 23m ago
Comparison overview · modeled scenario
Gwangyang leads in 5 of 6 tracked indicators.
Incheon currently leads the remaining indicators in this modeled comparison.
Momentum
Gwangyang
Efficiency
Gwangyang
Growth
Incheon
Reliability
Gwangyang
Capacity
Gwangyang
Risk
Gwangyang
Activity score · modeled
64.8
Incheon
MODERATE
Difference
+5.8
70.6
Gwangyang
POSITIVE
Port Activity (TEU)
Modeled activity series
Time range
IncheonGwangyang
Performance Shape
Percentile vs all 100 ports (100 = best) · modeled
IncheonGwangyang
Comparison Scoreboard
Reported throughput · modeled operations
| Metric | Incheon | Gwangyang | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global rank | #57 | #86 | 29 places apart |
| Monthly TEU · REPORTED | 269K | 144K | Incheon +125K TEU |
| Current activity · MODELED | Moderate | Strong | Gwangyang +5.8 pts |
| Activity movement · 24H | −13.48% | −2.62% | Gwangyang +10.86 pts |
| Vessels alongside · MODELED | 3 | 2 | Incheon 1 vessels more |
| Vessels inbound · MODELED | 5 | 5 | Even |
| Vessels waiting · MODELED | 2 | 1 | Gwangyang 1 vessels less |
| Average berth wait · MODELED | 6.2h | 4h | Gwangyang 2.2h less |
| Average time at berth · MODELED | 14.1h | 15.3h | Incheon 1.2h less |
| Berth utilization · MODELED | 60% | 66.7% | Gwangyang 6.7 pts more |
| Congestion / status | Clear | Clear | Same status |
Operations Comparison
MODELED operational sequence
Alongside
3
2
Inbound
5
5
Waiting
2
1
Berth wait
6.2h
4h
Time at berth
14.1h
15.3h
Utilization
60%
66.7%
IncheonGwangyang
Key Differences
Directly derived from current values
- Incheon is handling approximately 125K more monthly TEUs than Gwangyang.
- Gwangyang currently shows a 2.2 hour shorter modeled average berth wait.
- Gwangyang has 1 fewer modeled vessels waiting.
- Gwangyang has 6.7 percentage points higher modeled berth utilization.
- The ports are 29 places apart in the global throughput ranking.
Regional Context
Monthly TEU among each port's macro-region peers
Incheon vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Gwangyang vs. AsiaAvg 841K
Shanghai3.91M
Singapore3.19M
Ningbo-Zhoushan2.98M
Shenzhen2.53M
Qingdao2.34M
Continue exploring
Operational and activity values are MODELED · monthly and annual throughput are REPORTED · Methodology